Archives for posts with tag: compliance

Screen Shot 2013-01-04 at 8.46.10 PM

One of my friends, Dr. Aaron Kesselheim, at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School recently reported that patients seem less likely to take their medications if the pill color changes between prescriptions, which can happen when switching from a brand name to generic drug, says a new study. Currently, the U.S. allows cheaper generic drugs to be sold to patients after a brand-name counterpart’s market exclusivity ends. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states that generic drugs must be essentially as effective as the brand-name drugs, but may be different colors, shapes and sizes. One reason for the same drug having different appearances is that brand-name manufacturers may claim legal ownership of their drugs’ physical appearances.

That confusion may lead to patients being unsure about their medications and end with them not taking the drugs.

The researchers used a national database of medical claims from the early 2000s to compare people who got their seizure drugs refilled on time to those who did not.

Overall, they had information on about 61,000 people who were taking one of eight drugs, which were offered in 37 colors and four shapes.

The researchers found that changes in pill color between prescriptions rarely occurred, but there was a difference between those who filled their orders and those who did not.

Of the approximately 11,500 people who did not fill their prescriptions, 1.2 percent had their drugs change color. That compared to 0.97 percent of people who got their prescriptions filled on time.  Not very impressive numbers but with the millions of elderly patients, the impact can be significant.

Dr. Kesselheim points out that if patients are taking nine medicines, they get at least 36 ‘opportunities’ a year to experience a color change. This seemingly small risk then starts to appear very substantial. A patient taking five medicines twice a day, each produced by five different generic manufacturers, theoretically the patient faces over 3,000 possible arrays of pill appearances a year for what are, chemically and clinically speaking, the same drugs.

Perhaps equivalent generic medicines should be required to look like their brand-name counterparts.  Dr. Kesselheim said that until there is a better solution, it’s important for patients to know that a pill’s clinical impact doesn’t change just because it looks different.

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/W1EWU3, and JAMA Internal Medicine, online December 31, 2012.

Janus-The Good Of Beginnings and Endings

Janus is the Roman god of doors and gateways but also the god of beginnings.  Interestingly, good beginnings are required for good endings.  The Temple of Janus had doors facing east and west, which allowed illumination of the temple at the beginning and the end of the day.  Most statues of Janus show him with two faces facing opposite directions.

The Janus principle in your medical practice is the idea of creating a favorable beginning of the doctor-patient interaction which culminates in a favorable ending.

How to get off to a good a good beginning?

It all starts with the first impression.  There’s a world of difference if the doctor enters the room and launches into medical questions versus the doctor who uses the first few seconds to talk about some non-medical topic such as the patient’s family, work, or last vacation.  This information can be obtained by keeping social progress notes on the written chart or on the first screen of the EMR.  Now the doctor demonstrates his interest in the patient and not an organ system, a diagnosis, or lab or X-ray report.  You can be sure that this registers in a positive way with your patient and well worth the few seconds it takes to demonstrate caring for the whole patient.

The Janus Close

Closing the office visit is the natural conclusion of every patient interaction.  Every patient visit needs to terminate with a successful close.  You will know you have closed successfully when the patient agrees to your advice, promises to take the medication, obtain the studies you suggest, or accept the surgical procedure you recommended.  Most patients leave without any physical evidence of their commitment to the doctor.  The close is intangible but you can recognize the signs of agreement or rejection very easily.

The Janus principle focuses less on rote formulas such as ending each visit with, “Is there anything else I can answer for you today?”  It does take into consideration the general tone and feel of the conversation with care and attention to begin well and to close well.  If it is done well, you have buy-in from the patient and a greater likelihood of enhanced compliance from the patient and improvement in patient outcomes.  You increase the buy-in if you learn to listen to what the patient says and pay attention to both verbal and non-verbal clues, which provide you with the feedback of the success of your close.

Doctors have the luxury of asking probing questions.  I am always amazed at the depth of questions that I am allowed to ask in areas that no other person could ask another individual.  After meeting a patient for the first time, I am able to ask about their personal life, their sex life, and their bowel habits.  No other professional could possibly accomplish this except a physician.  In order to be successful at asking probing, we must appear genuine and that we are caring and avoid making the patient defensive.  The best probing questions are open ended and not answered by mere yes and no questions.  It is a far better question to ask how the chief complaint is impacting the patient’s quality of life rather than is the pain mild, moderate or severe.

Next make sure to validate or acknowledge probing question that you ask.  This can be a head nod or use the echo technique of restating the last phrase of the patient’s response to your probing question.  For example, if I ask a man about his ability to engage in sexual intimacy with his partner and he responds that the problem is upsetting his partner.  I would counter with “How is this upsetting your partner?”  This clearly lets the patient know you have heard his response and you are paying attention to the discussion.

Psychologists point out that 70% of the population respond better to suggestions than to warnings.  Nearly 80% of patients’ buy ins are made emotionally and then they use logic to defend their behaviors.  You might approach the close by asking the patient what they feel about the lifestyle changes you might be suggesting they make.  If the patient agrees to the plan of action, you can ask for agreed upon goals.  Perhaps you can ask the patient to join the YMCA or a local gym and commit to an exercise program with the goal of losing two pounds in the next month or before their next visit.

This brings the Janus close to a successful conclusion.  You use the probing questions, provided the patient with motivation, and then receive their commitment and buy-in resulting in improved compliance.

Bottom Line:  We have less time to spend with patients because of the greater volume of patients that most of us are going to be seeing in the near future.  We will have to be experts at communication in order connect with our patients which begins with great openings and positive clsings. The Janus close starts with a good beginning and then has a happy ending.